The findings hold regardless of cultural background, say researchers
They suggest the pain caused by circumcision may be partly to blame
This may in turn affect how the brain develops and reacts to stress
Study looked at 340,000 boys born in Denmark between 1994 and 2003
But experts have urged caution over the ‘extremely speculative findings’
Circumcision Before Age Five Can Double Boy’s Risk Of Developing Autism
Scientists believe the finding may be linked to stress caused by the pain of the procedure. The study of more than 340,000 boys in Denmark found that circumcision raised the overall chances of an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) before the age of 10 by 46%. But if circumcision took place before the age of five it doubled the risk. Circumcision also appeared to increase the likelihood of boys from non-Muslim families developing hyperactivity disorder.
Professor Morten Frisch, of the Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, who led the research, said: “Our investigation was prompted by the combination of recent animal findings linking a single painful injury to lifelong deficits in stress response. Also a study showed a strong, positive correlation between a country’s neonatal male circumcision rate and its prevalence of ASD in boys.”
Traumatic Pain May Cause Circumcision And Autism
Medical associations considered it unacceptable today to circumcise boys without proper pain relief. However many hospitals still do not consider anesthesia necessary. Even with anesthesia, it is not possible to make the procedure completely pain-free. The pain of circumcision is likely to be more severe in very young babies both during and after the operation, according to the scientists. Painful experiences in newborns have been shown in both animal and human studies to be associated with long-term alterations in pain perception. This characteristic is often seen in autistic children.
Prof Frisch added: “Possible mechanisms linking early life pain and stress to an increased risk of neurodevelopmental, behavioral or psychological problems in later life remain incompletely conceptualized.
“Non-therapeutic circumcision in infancy and childhood is a widespread practice around the world. Our findings should prompt other researchers to examine the possibility that circumcision trauma in infancy or early childhood might carry an increased risk of serious neuro-developmental and psychological consequences,” said Frisch. The findings are reported in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
Some Religious Academics Dispute Circumcision Autism Link
Professor David Katz, from University College London, also chairs Milah UK. Milah is an organization that speaks for the Jewish community on issues related to circumcision. He said, “This report is far from convincing: correlation does not equal causation.
“There is a long history of attempts to link autistic spectrum disorders to unrelated practices, such as the measles/mumps/rubella association. These have proved to be fraudulent. “General agreement exists that in people suffering from an ASD there are abnormalities. These can be identified in brain structure and/or function. Autism may also have a strong genetic component, which may be a factor within the faith communities studied here. This does not appear to have been explored amongst them.
Some contemporary research does indicate that factors besides the genetic component are contributing to the increasing occurrence of ASD. For example, a variety of environmental toxins have been invoked to explain why these conditions are more prevalent today than in the past. But again proof of causation is lacking, and these factors are only likely to be relevant in those who are already vulnerable to them.
More Academic Experts Weigh In On ASD Risk
Applied statistician Professor Kevin McConway, from the Open University said, “This study raises an interesting question, but one that cannot be fully answered with these data.”
“The study is observational, and in such studies it’s always tricky to tell what causes what. The observed increase in risk of autism spectrum disorder in circumcised boys might be due to the circumcision. But it may be from other factors too.”
“Religions that prescribe circumcision prescribe other things too, such as diet or clothing. Perhaps differences in diet or clothing lead to the increased ASD risk, rather than the circumcision. Cultural and family differences may be crucial.”
Read more: Daily Mail: Circumcised boys may be more likely to develop autism
circumcisn is a barbaric practice of utter stupidity. GOD made no mistake when male and female were made as all animals are made in the image of GOD.
What troubles me is that 5 years after Frisch’s findings, no American medical organization has commented publicly on it. Worse, nor have they begun further studies. I cannot help but suspect they would rather not know results which may tarnish their reputation.
Professor Conway is right that an observational study might not account for variables among the studied population. However, his suggestion that diet of clothing may be confounding factors is a weak argument. First, that clothing or diet may increase risk of ASD is not only farfetched, but the mere citing of those as examples suggests a lack of other more credible examples. Second, Frisch’s findings of a 46% higher ASD incidence in circumcised boys is so great a differential that the only reasonable course is not to seek flaws in the study, but to do further research. If further research is seriously planned or already ongoing, I would very much like to know.